Lahore High Court Lahore — Judgments of 1969
214 reported judgments of the Lahore High Court Lahore from 1969 — page 3 of 3.
- KHUDA BAKHSH v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1132
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 323 & 325 Wife Accused Of Disobedience Beating, Thick Stick Like A Little Finger And Dealing With Kicking And Fist Hair The Medical Report reported no injuries. Is a sympt…
- ZAHIR AHMAD SURI v. WAZIR AHMAD CHUGHTAI 1969 PCRLJ 1161
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (5) The person who canceled Lux Standby's bail to move the application, neither the prosecution witness nor any person belonging to the murdered person. Th…
- MUHAMMAD DIN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1173
The Pakistan Penal Code section 8 468 / acqu acqutedge was forfeited by a person accused of defrauding a person accused of a crime under Section 8 468, there is nothing to indicate who has charged him…
- MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1180
Proof of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) Section & 350 & 7 Criminal Criminal Trial is filed partly by the trial judge, and partly by the Judge's written statement and judgment by the Judge. In which case, a…
- AYUB HUSSAIN SHAH v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1182
The Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) read with section read9, only the order recognizing the request for review of the sentence, neither section nor any final order was placed within the meaning of sec…
- ALLAH BAKHSH v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1204
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 154 First Information Report The complainant met with the police officer about the return of the police station to the FIR on the spot.…
- MUHAMMAD AKHTAR v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1225
The Pakistan Penal Code section 97 is also accused of possessing sharp weapons with the defendant accused of obtaining evidence of private defense, criminal right to possession of property and evidenc…
- MANZOOR AHMAD v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1239
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) read with section 767676 (195 195) (1) (C) It was alleged that the offense of forgery was proved before the civil court, except for the offense. Of such a court complai…
- Mst. ASAFA SULTANA v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1259
The Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) section 561 reads disputedly over the determination of real estate rentals deciding the property under the real estate rent controller, but such property applicants …
- QUTAB SHAH v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1270
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section (B) and 190 190 190 Complainants are addressing the petition to the Applicant High Court, in which petitioner (a Superintendent of Police) has been demanded tha…
- MUSHTAQEEM v. Mst. HAJRAN BIBI 1969 PCRLJ 1288
Investing in family courts under Section 488, CR PCs, notification under Section 20 of the Act, Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 488 West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), Section S&20…
- KHURSHID v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1312
Crimes read with sections 251 and 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC), not on the police report, but on the accused, have been charged, in this case by the police under section 161. Not able …
- JUMMA KHAN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1333
The medical examination of the accused by the Pakistan Penal Code Section 376 rape prosecution cannot be accepted as the principle of a global plea only to ascertain its physical instability or inabil…
- NIZAM v. BAHADUR 1969 PCRLJ 1462
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 439 The High Court is absolutely correct in its discretion so finding the facts or the law or the inferior court's order is not legal, correct or appropriate, o…
Other years — Lahore High Court Lahore
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1987 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957 · 1956 · 1955 · 1954 · 1953 · 1952 · 1951 · 1950 · 1949
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.