Karachi High Court Sindh — Judgments of 1969
154 reported judgments of the Karachi High Court Sindh from 1969 — page 2 of 2.
- NOOR MUHAMMAD v. THE TRIBUNAL AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KARACHI 1969 PCRLJ 639
The Karachi Control of Disorderly Persons Act 1952, the Tribunal declared person 12 and 13 as a dangerous and careless person and several fraud cases against him were found pending only one case in wh…
- MEHBOOB ALI v. Syed QAMAR ALI 1969 PCRLJ 641
Instead of transferring the remand of the case under section 1 3501 to transfer the successor of the magistrate under section 350 under section 1 of the Criminal Code (CCPC) Section 1 561, the trial m…
- KHIALDAS AND ANOTHER v. MAHRAJ GOPI KRISHIN 1969 PLD 646
Rule 92 of Civil Code 1908 and O1, the application of R8 scope is limited to a representative suit under the OI; r 8 suits filed by the trust which are not incorporated under the consent of the Advoca…
- MANZOOR SALEEM PARVEZ v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 647
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) was charged under Section 30BB, PPC under Section 8B but was later convicted of bail, but later, on the death of the victim, changed to bail under Section 30?B. Turned …
- PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN v. SIND PURCHASING BOARD, KARACHI 1969 PLD 653
Government of India Act 1935 section 175 (3) does not require the government to disclose the contract in a formal process, it is not necessary that a contract be made in the name of the governor. Shal…
- MIR GHAUS BAKHSH BIZANJO v. CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF PAKISTAN AND 2 OTHERS 1969 PLD 662
National and Provincial Assemblies (Elections) Act 1964, Chapter IV and the National and Provincial Assemblies (Elections) Act (VII of 1964), Section 12 (2) (a) (i), 14 (3) (a), (d) ( iii) Election Ro…
- ABDUL KHALIQUE MALIK v. Mst. SHAMIM ARA 1969 PCRLJ 688
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Failure to comply with section 488 rehabilitation court order, pending notice of stay, condition for issuing further orders to enforce restitution order.…
- SAIFUR REHMAN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 690
Under section 420, consider the Pakistan Penal Code Section 420 Principal for penalties, representation on the basis of which the person transferring the property for transfer of property should be de…
- ABBAS KHALEELI AND OTHERS v. SAIFUDDIN VALIKA AND OTHERS 1969 PLD 692
Civil Procedure Code Order of the CPC Parties read with the Civil Society Registration Act (XXI of 1860).…
- PIR BUX v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 700
Section 3 and 6 of the West Pakistan Goats (Ban) Ordinance 1959 Complaint of goats grazing in the restricted area has not been declared as a specific area nor is there any restriction on the grazing o…
- IKRAM v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 701
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 417 sentenced several people to trial for wrongful evidence and due to negligence of a public prosecutor. Expressed indifference to the matter…
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CENTRAL) KARACHI v. UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK LTD., KARACHI 1969 PTD 730
Income Tax Act 1922 Section 10 (2) (X), Proviso (B) Employees Read Bonus To Employees Of A Company Branch In Pakistan, Inappropriate But Valid Business Expenses…
- MUHAMMAD SALMAN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 736
Sections 517, Section 5 and 23 of the Act, read with the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (VII of 1947), have been punished and fined for not having bank drafts and cash. With no jurisdiction, the comm…
- FAZAL v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 740
Section 302 reads with sections 100 and 103, the defense of the right of the armed man through private defense, encroachment, coming to enforce his right to turn the accused's pit and not to die in an…
- HASHMATULLAH v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 774
Pakistan Penal Code Section 411 Stolen Property There is no definite evidence that the articles allegedly stolen from the accused persons were stolen.…
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL, KARACHI v. MESSRS PESTONJI RHICAJI, STEVEDORES AND DUBASHES, KARACHI 1969 PTD 821
Read with section (66 (1) section 13, the provisions of first proviso & c 23 (3) section 13 differ from the reliability of the books and accounts of the parties and accounts depending on the prerequis…
- Syed ALI KAUSAR v. THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN THROUGH THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF INTERIOR-OPPOSITE 1969 PCRLJ 890
External Order, Illegal and Illegal, Defending Order for the Goodwill of Karachi Controlled Disorderly Persons Act 1952…
- THE STATE v. Kazi ABDUL HAFEEZ KHAN 1969 PCRLJ 891
Under Section 476 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC), the Presiding Officer has been given sufficient discretion to conduct or not hold probation, however, the exercise of such discretion, under…
- K. E. HEYDEN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 900
Complaint under Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 1 5620 Section 20, PP, PPC magistrate ordered any person to terminate the proceedings without having to process the facts on the issue of summon…
- MUSHTAQ v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 930
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 394 and 397 suffered serious injuries due to robbery…
- KHAMOON v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 946
The unlawful assembly of Pakistan Penal Code Section 148 is just the fact that no clear action taken by the prosecution witnesses against the accused can justify their acquittal.…
- Choudhri ADALAT KHAN v. MUHAMMAD ARIF 1969 PCRLJ 975
Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 9 Pro9 charge under section 408, PPC prosecution not presenting available evidence and beyond reasonable doubt beyond doubt, the accused had the benefit of doubt…
- Mir GHOUS BAKHSH BAZENJO v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 991
Release the Commissioner's powers and the Tribunal and the Deputy Commissioner's opinions as well as independent conclusions under the West Pakistan Criminal Laws (Special Provisions) Ordinance 1968 S…
- Mst. RANI v. CHANDU 1969 PCRLJ 1033
Articles 31 and 33 of the West Pakistan Criminal Law (Special Provisions) Ordinance 1968 and Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 250 Quetta and Qalat (Civil and Criminal Law) Ordinance (III of 19…
- ALI MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1077
Pakistan Penal Code Section 394 accused of being involved in committing robbery had full knowledge of robbery with the accused and lives with them if convicted.…
- Haji SHAMSUDDIN ISMAIL v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1143
In its report to the Dispute Magistrate in relation to Sections 145 (1) and 146 real estate police officers, there was a dispute between the parties which feared a breach of the peace and it was recom…
- TERENCE ANTHONY D\' CASTA v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1228
Pakistan Penal Code Section 304A Rash & Negligent Driving The fact that the accused was driving fast at the time of the accident cannot automatically be construed as a defect or negligence in the mean…
- ALLAH WARAYO v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1237
West Pakistan Weapons Ordinance 1965 Section 13 (e) Failure to testify against each other, without a licensed pistol Exporting a prosecutor's residence more than 100 yards from the house of the accuse…
- MUHAMMAD ALI v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1265
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 161, the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), the Section 5 (2) trap case is not sufficient to prove the alleged fraudulent recovery of money, the recovery of mon…
- ALI MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1278
Pakistan Penal Code Section 411 The accused accused of stealing stolen property claimed to be his own because only one of the 14 accused mentioned in the FIR was found to have been found in fact 13 ou…
- HAJAN KHAN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1285
Testimony of Section 114 Judicial Prosecutor of the Evidence Act 1872 is sending a request to the superior police officer immediately after the incident. Prosecutors pressured him for fear that if bro…
- ALI AKBAR v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1307
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 366 and 367 Judges Rule 366 and 367 Although not applicable to the High Courts, the jurisprudence principles are accepted and the High Courts decision is follo…
- WAHID BUX v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1317
The prosecution witnesses who participated in the Evidence Act 1872 Section 9 test are aware that the accused was injured in the exchange of fire The suspect was alone bandaged and unconscious in the …
- THE STATE v. Syed MUSAWER SHAH 1969 PCRLJ 1323
Sindh Abkakis Act 1878 Section 43 (3) Search Recovery Excise Officer Accuses of Raiding Nursing Rebellion Against the accused Police had earlier reported false cases regarding the police and once agai…
- MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1328
Evidence Act 1872 Section 45 Expert Opinion Expert opinion in the safe custody of those accused of fraudulently misappropriating documents in government funds, which is not binding on the courts and r…
- MUHAMMAD KHAN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1347
Evidence Act 1872 Section 54 The Ballistic Expert sends the Crime Ballistic Expert to the Prosecutor for prosecution neither presenting expert reports nor filing a report from the prosecution, under t…
- RAZAK v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1354
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) read with Section 59 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), private defense from the arrest of section 97 private person, no guaranteed and admissible offense in view of the prosecu…
- BAZ MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1355
The death sentence on the unethical terms of the defense parties read with the Pakistan Penal Code Section 304, Part II, Section 97, was charged with Part II in connection with the knife injury and li…
- MOHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1380
The Pakistan Penal Code section 379, the party complaining of theft, is accusing the accused of apprehending and injuring him, even though he is armed with a hatchet, to avoid any injury to the compla…
- MUHAMMAD YOUSUF v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1408
Section 161 of the Pakistan Penal Code read with the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Trap fraudulent money was neither passed nor placed in the drawer, leaving the seat in fro…
- MUHAMMAD BUX v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1437
Read with section 302, section 300, exception 1 In the circumstances of the grave and sudden aggravated extortion, the wife and her paramour requested to be found guilty of adultery. Declared…
- GHAZI v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1453
In Pakistan Panel Code Section 326 FIR, illegal witnesses from time to time change statements from time to time, attempt to establish weak links in the prosecution case and withdraw from their stateme…
- MUHAMMAD YAR v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1458
Pakistan Penal Code Section 2 & 2 Ev2 Murder Proof Unknown Proof For example of the accused, retrieving the body, being buried in the field, the fact that the accused knew the truth and his body was r…
- SOBDAR v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1473
Clash with Section 302 of Section 302…
- BADAL KHAN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1490
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 465 fake prosecution witness for the first time in cross-examination alleged that he found the number on non-hearing receipts when the accused did not find any evidence…
- THE STATE v. KHAN AFSAR 1969 PCRLJ 1504
Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC), read with the Evidence Act (I of 1872), Section 30 confession, voluntarily making confessional statement from the accused to conclude the murder o…
- MUHAMMAD SALIM v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1519
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) has been read with Section 561 Section 499 which confirms the resolution of the bail which has been guaranteed and has been issued instructions by the District and Addi…
- DIN MUIIAMMAD v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1527
Pakistan Penal Code Section Private 97 accused of launching an unprovoked attack on a private defense, party worker complaining of sudden fighting and hitting the accused with multiple sticks, stabbed…
- JODAT ALI v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1532
A proportion of the Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) section 561 proceeding to file a complaint or to submit contradictions in the evidence cannot be concluded that the evidence is false, the trial cour…
- ALI NAWAZ v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1537
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 161 was read with the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Trap Case Prosecution witnesses give different copies at different times and the money tr…
- KARIM BAKHSH JAN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1551
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1947 Section 23 The firm intends to export a particular item overseas and refund the sale amount within the stipulated months, but a partner of the firm was accused of …
- Khawaja GHULAM RASOOL v. AMANULLAH KHAN 1969 PCRLJ 1569
The Pakistan Penal Code section 406 read with the Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898); Section 561 is charged with one count of misconduct, responsibility, if any, and business account dispute over bus…
- YAROO alias YAR MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1580
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 164 Prosecutor's witnesses make admissions in favor of the accused in their statements in the Sessions Court, examining the evidence of such witnesses not in th…
- KHAIR MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1586
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 164 confession, neither in the declaration of death of the accused nor in the first information report does the circumstantial evidence that the accused do not …
Other years — Karachi High Court Sindh
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1987 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.