Federal Court of Pakistan — Judgments of 1955
25 reported judgments of the Federal Court of Pakistan from 1955.
- GHULAM MUHAMMAD SHAH v. FATEH MUHAMMAD SHAH 1955 PLD 1
Federal Court Rules and Orders 1950 Federal Court Rules 1950, OXVII, rr 2 and 4 cannot be ruled out when an appeal is sought by the prosecutor unless the procedure prescribed under the rules is follow…
- M. IBRAHIM v. THE CROWN 1955 PLD 14
Section 151, 152 Constitution and questioning format The court's authority to regulate sections 151, 152, the Evidence Act empowers the court to regulate and control the manner and form of questions i…
- CROWN v. SULTAN MAHMOOD 1955 PLD 20
Appeal from Breach of Section 417 Can the government not appeal, appeal, even after identifying their final decision, and in the meantime the application for review of the breach has been dismissed?…
- KARAM ALI v. RAJA 1955 PLD 35
The plaintiff cannot, on the basis of the possession and disposition of suit 144 and 144 of the Limitation Act 1908, later say that it should be considered in constructive possession by the defendant.…
- ABDUL MAJID v. KHALIL AHMAD 1955 PLD 38
Civil Code 1908 Section 100 Finding facts together through the lower courts, even if it may be false, if the evidence is considered by the court, cannot be disturbed by the High Court in the second ap…
- TALIB v. CROWN 1955 PLD 42
Sections 9439 and 7367 ()) Extending Sentencing The principle is not restricted to the trial judge's discretion, and the lower death sentence in the High Court on behalf of the private party for an ex…
- RAB NAWAZ v. CROWN 1955 PLD 63
Section 304 is a fine offense or negligence which is intended to cause death.…
- RAFIQUE v. CROWN 1955 PLD 70
The Pakistan Penal Code accused the accused under section 302 but the sessions judge sentenced him under section 304, Part 1 PPC and he was sentenced to seven years imprisonment. On appeal, the Chief …
- KADIR BUX v. CROWN 1955 PLD 79
The terms in which Sections 492 and 417 of the CR PC are expressed have no room for any elaborate interpretation as it relates to the words of Section 417, CR PC as well as Section 417, CR PC. is abou…
- ABDUL WAHAB v. CROWN 1955 PLD 88
The S 342 object should give the accused notice of the points he must meet so that he may excuse himself.…
- ABDUR RASHID v. FALAK SHER 1955 PLD 98
Penalties under section 2 (3) are penalties…
- IBRAHIM BAK v. CROWN 1955 PLD 113
Section 6? 6. When an action is taken against a person, he or she can be detained or ordered to provide security for a hearing. It is only in the interest of justice to find out that an offense listed…
- ABDUS SALAM MOLLA v. CROWN 1955 PLD 129
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 342? Non-compliance, which leads the accused to prejudice?…
- LALAN v. CROWN 1955 PLD 132
The section 342 case is based primarily on eye evidence? Witness? The suspects were not questioned on other matters, for example, indications of motives, previous threats to the accused's arrest?…
- SWAMI TURIANANDA v. RADHA KANTA PAL 1955 PLD 145
Succession Act 1925 applies to matters relating to taiyis before grant of probes 230 and 263…
- FAZAL DAD v. CROWN 1955 PLD 152
Section 7 33 I (IA) removals to record reasons for exclusion will not affect the admissibility of proof of admissibility in the absence of a failure of justice.…
- KHAN SHER DIL KHAN v. WALI OF SWAT 1955 PLD 174
Section? 86 Absence of consent is not tolerable at all? Consent, holding, invalid after filing deadline? The Limitation Act (IX of sections 13 and 14 of 1908, held, did not draw…
- MUMTAZ AHMAD v. UMTUL HABIB 1955 PLD 178
Not enough reason is not sensitive to precise definitions. Each case has to decide on its own particular circumstances…
- RAFIQ-UD-DIN v. CROWN 1955 PLD 183
Under Section 411, Pakistan Penal Code is charged with receiving stolen property, PPC Property is accused of being part of 3 different burglaries of different dates but recovered from the accused at t…
- ANWAR v. CROWN 1955 PLD 185
Whether or when instructing the High Court to re-examine a bad person based on the finding of facts on the evidence), Section 556 [Khairidi Khan v. Crown Law (PLD 1953 FC 223)) and now Pakistan Is not…
- FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN v. MAULVI TAMIZUDDIN 1955 PLD 240
Indian Freedom Act 1947, Indian Freedom Act, 1947, Sections 5 6 (3), 8 (I), 223? Hey, the Chief Justice's approval? The General Assembly is essential for all legislatures of the Constituent Assembly, …
- KHUDA BUKHSH v. THE CROWN 1955 PLD 378
The Charter charge was framed by the magistrate committing the offense under Section 2 302/3434, with the PPC session judge terminating the section off and as the principal on both the accused under S…
- NAZIR AHMAD v. THE CROWN 1955 PLD 383
Sections 9 and 10 of the Opium Act 1878 confiscated the boxes containing the heads of the poppy, giving evidence that they knew that the boxes containing the heads of the poppy were charged.…
- USIF PATEL v. THE CROWN 1955 PLD 387
Under the Indian Independence (Amendment) Act 1948, 1948, it was intended to be granted by section 2 of the Emergency Power Ordinance, IX of 1955, on the basis of the invalidity of the Governor Genera…
- ABDUL HAQ v. THE CROWN 1955 PLD 401
The Punjab Disturbance (Public Inquiry) Ordinance 1953 has been appealed to the Federal Court by order of a judicial inquiry constituted under the Punjab Disturbance (Public Inquiry v. Ordinance (III …
Other years — Federal Court of Pakistan
1960 · 1956 · 1955 · 1954 · 1953 · 1952 · 1951 · 1950
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.