Environmental Protection Tribunal Karachi — Judgments of 2012

5 reported judgments of the Environmental Protection Tribunal Karachi from 2012.

• DIRECTOR-GENERAL, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH v. RAEES-UL-HASSAN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, HABIB SUGAR MILLS, NAWABSHAH 2012 CLD 1696

  Complaints against sections 11, 16, 17, 21 and 22 of the contamination The prosecutor's case was that he had received complaints against the accused / mill in connection with the contamination and sta…

• DIRECTOR-GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH v. ABDUL KHALIQ 2012 CLD 1848

  Sections 11, 16, 17, 21 and 22 in the domestic treatment of discharge of waste water without any environment The respondent / factory alleges that the domestic wastewater generated by it was higher th…

• COCA COLA BEVERAGES (PAKISTAN) LIMITED v. DIRECTOR-GENERAL, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2012 CLD 1887

  Sections 11, 16, and 22 fail to comply with national environmental standards and to prevent pollution, the Environmental Protection Order was issued to the appellant / factory saying that it was disch…

• DIRECTOR-GENERAL, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH v. MOHSIN TABANI, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TMK SUGAR MILL 2012 CLD 2004

  Sections 11, 16, 17 and 21 (3) (a) exclude or exclude any contamination and waste complaint against the definition of evidence of environmental sampling rules, 2001, R8 (2) evidence of wastewater samp…

• DIRECTOR-GENERAL, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH v. SHABBIR AHMED, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 2012 CLD 2032

  Release of untreated contaminated environmental protection agency, sections 11 and 16, by the Environmental Protection Agency Inspection Team Wastewater was inspected and obtained, found that levels o…

Other years — Environmental Protection Tribunal Karachi

2012

Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.