East Pakistan Labour Court — Judgments of 1971
28 reported judgments of the East Pakistan Labour Court from 1971.
- THE MANAGER, KARIM JUTE MILLS LTD.,DACCA v. DELHI MUSLIM HOTEL KARMACHARI UNION,DACCA 1971 PLC 17
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 28 and 45 (1) strike notice is not necessary for 21 days but refuses and refuses to serve strike notice from optional management workers. Received, under t…
- K. D. H. SRAMIK UNION (REGD.) v. MESSRS K. D. H. LABORATORIES LTD., DACCA 1971 PLC 19
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 45 prohibits lockout of workers…
- HUMAYUN MIRZA v. THE CHAIRMAN, M. M. ISPAHANI LTD., 1971 PLC 22
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 section \ 34 and East Pakistan Employment Jobs (Standing Orders) Act (VII of 1965); Section 25, applicant under section 34 of the Beltapplication Applicants, Indust…
- THE SECRETARY, EAST PAKISTAN ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. THE E. P. R. T. C. WORKERS\' UNION 1971 PLC 24
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 47 and East Pakistan Employment of Labor (Standing Orders) Act (VIII of 1965), Request for Court Approval of Recovery of Waste Workers During the Approval o…
- THE MANAGING EDITOR, THE DAILY AZADI, CHITTAGONG v. CHITTAGONG NEWSPAPERS PRESS WORKERS\' UNION 1971 PLC 35
Section 5 (3) and Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 46 (1) (d) Section 47 (2) (8), 34 and 45 (1) are read with settlement, Section 5 (3). Reached between the parties), the East P…
- THE EAST PAKISTAN AIRLINES PILOTS ASSOCIATION, v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN 1971 PLC 42
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 8 (3) Trade Union Registration Appeals To Labor Court Scope Court…
- Kazi FAZLUL KARIM v. TILE DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR, NATIONAL BANK OF. PAKISTAN, DACCA 1971 PLC 53
Article 18 (2) read with the National Bank of Pakistan Ordinance (XIX of 1949), Article 32 and Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 225 (7), repealed the provisions of the National Bank of Pakista…
- MODERN SANITARY FITTINGS MANUFACTURING CO. (PRIVATE), LTD. SRAMIK UNION v. MODERN SANITARY FITTINGS MANUFACTURING CO. (PRIVATE) LTD., DACCA 1971 PLC 58
Request for withdrawal of industrial dispute pending lockout under section 34 and 43 section 43 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, under the circumstances, not retained under section 34…
- K. D. H. SRAMIK UNION v. K. D. H. LABORATORIES LTD., DACCA 1971 PLC 70
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 recovered due to redundancy caused by industrial 34 and 47 industrial conflict 47 private business, independently, arrested for any reason, economic or for any othe…
- MD. BADIUL ALAM v. IDRIS AL QAZI 1971 PLC 76
Industrial Relations Ordinance Section 34 of 1969 was read with the East Pakistan Minimum Wakas (Fact 4 One Ordinance (X of 1969)), the minimum number of workers in the Section 5 factory which has mor…
- GENERAL SECRETARY, FINLAY EMPLOYEES\'UNION, DACCA v. Messe JAMES FINLAY & Co. LTD., DACCA 1971 PLC 81
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 lags behind in disregarding Section 34 seniority, unlawful application under section 34 of the Workers' Union, in the circumstances, is permitted and the re-wor…
- PROJECT MAN AGER, MESSRS AMIN JUTE MILLS LTD., CHITTAGONG v. MD. ISMAIL 1971 PLC 97
Section 2 (k) of the Industrial Disputes Ordinance 1959, section 44 (VI of the Industrial Disputes Ordinance (VI of 1965), Section 44, Industrial Disputes Ordinance (LVI of 1959), 3 2 and section 67 (…
- RESIDENT EDITOR, THE EASTERN EXAMINER, CHITTAGONG v. SHAFIQUR RAHMAN 1971 PLC 101
Section 2 (k) of the East Pakistan Labor Conflict Act (VII of 1965), Section 44 (3) and Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 67 (2) (b) of the Industrial Court, established under th…
- KARNAPHULI RAYON, & CHEMICALS LTD., CHITTAGONG v. KARNAPHULI RAYON & CHEMICAL WORKERS\' UNION 1971 PLC 105
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 34 and 45 (1) Application under section 45 (1) Pre-action to refer the court to the prohibition of the workers / union prohibiting conditions under section…
- MESSRS A. K. KHAN & Co. LTD., CHITTAGONG v. EAST PAKISTAN WATER TRANSPORT WORKERS\' UNION 1971 PLC 109
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 section 2 (xiii) and 34 whether a particular organization is a collective bargaining agent or not, no industrial dispute can provide relief under the Labor Cour…
- WALI AHMAD v. MESSRS HABIB BANK LTD., CHITAGONG 1971 PLC 111
Review of Industrial Disputes The Labor Court's decision held that the court should have benefited from the suspension and that its decision on dismissal was the wrong court, however, no significant m…
- C. & B. ROAD & BUILDING SRAMIK UNION, CHITTAGONG v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA 1971 PLC 163
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 1 (3) The workers of the Roads and Highways Directorate of the East Pakistan Government provide infill services to the workers for the purpose of forming tr…
- MESSRS K. S. B. PUMPS Co. LTD., DACCA v. WORKMEN 1971 PLC 166
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 34 and 43 cannot be deemed to exist unless collective bargaining agents, in the presence of existing trade unions, raise the charter of demands recognized …
- WORKERS\' UNION v. MESSRS RENWICK & Co. LTD., KUSHTIA 1971 PLC 214
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 34, 54 and 55 and Minimum Wages (Fixation Ordinance, 1969), Relief in Section 8 under Sections 54 and 55, Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 and Section …
- WORKERS\' UNION v. CHAIRMAN, EAST PAKISTAN ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, DACCA 1971 PLC 291
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 47 and 60 read with the Payment of Pay Act (IV of 1966), Section 15 15 deduction in wages on the principle of unpaid salary / payment of penalty or change o…
- MAY & BAKER EMPLOYEES\' UNION v. MAY & BAKER LTD. DACCA 1971 PLC 294
Articles 28 and 32 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 strike labor / union have the power to strike deer even after the expiry of the 21-day legal notice, the employer exercising his right to …
- Syed OBAIDUL HAQUE v. MESSRS OMAR SONS LTD., DACCA, 1971 PLC 311
Sections 19 (1), Provo (2), 25 (1) (6) and 35 (6) read with the Payment Wages Act (IV of 1936), before the Labor Court on the claim of overtime pay of Sections 15 and 22 Claims for payment of wages pa…
- FIRE SERVICE SRAMIK UNION, CHITTAGONG v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA 1971 PLC 358
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 1 (3) and the Registration of Fire Service Directorate of the 9 Trade Union of Fire Service personnel, enlisted the industry-leading worker in the East …
- MUHAMMAD ABDUL GAFUR v. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, BUILDING DIRECTORATE, GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA 1971 PLC 364
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xiv), (xxvii) Government Establishment A government agency carrying out such work may run "industry" for the purposes of ordinance workers of such public…
- EASTERN RUBBER WORKERS\' UNION v. THE MANAGING PARTNFR, EASTERN RUBBER INDUSTRIES, DACCA 1971 PLC(CS) 468
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 34 [as amended by the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XIX of 1970]] Minimum wages of employees in minimum wage establishment 50 Minimum wages and arrears pa…
- S. A. ANSARI v. EASTERN RUBBER INDUSTRIES, DACCA 1971 PLC(CS) 473
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 is read with section 34 East Pakistan Factories Act (IV of 1965), Sections 51, 58 and 79; workers are not allowed acceptable facilities under the Holiday Overti…
- DARJEE KARMACHARI UNION, DACCA v. IDRIS MASTER 1971 PLC(CS) 476
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xvi) and 34 workers were neither discharged, neither dismissed nor reheated nor allowed to heat exhaust, due to illegal partial lockout. The working pers…
- K. A. HAI v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BENGAL RUBBER INDUSTRIES LTD., DACCA 1971 PLC(CS) 496
In section 34 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, the prohibited strike and dispute by the Government of the East Pakistan Employment (Standing Orders) Act (VII of 1965), Sections 6 (5) and 9 …
Other years — East Pakistan Labour Court
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.