Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RASHID versus STATE

Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (XLV of 1860), S, 161 Criminal Procedure Code (V 1818), each was charged with taking bribes because it was charged by prosecution. That this is his own free will. The prosecution accused the accused of not even pointing to the allegations against the accused that they had jointly tried the case with the accused, as well as his trial. Prejudice was also present, and such irregularities were not curable under section 577. The evacuation and his conviction and sentence were set aside in circumstances, however, the trial was not ordered against the accused, as he had already faced criminal proceedings for almost ten years. Mohammed Abdul Rauf v State PLD 1958 SC 131: Statements of Fame and 2 other v. 1968 PCRL J 1935; Ishtiaq Ali v. State 1977 PCRL 145 and Mohammed Abbas v. 1973 SCMR 542 Ref. divorce advocates from Tarnol lawyer