Find a Lawyer

ASFAND YAR KHAN versus CHIEF COMMISSIONER, ISLAMABAD CAPITAL TERRITORY, ISLAMABAD

Pakistan Mining Concession Rules 1960 Shadow II, CLS (15) and (72) Islamabad Wildlife (Protection, Protection, Protection and Management) Ordinance (LXX 1979), Section 21 Limestone Excavation The applicant challenging the termination of the lease for the lease termination. The High Court has, in its constitutional jurisdiction, recorded on the basis of the records that the lease closure has been justified on the ground that the area boundary authorities are subject to Section 21, Islamabad Wildlife (Protection). , Conservation, Conservation and Management (Ordinance, 1979), breaking ground or excavating or removing rocks, etc. were prohibited from the area covered, therefore, the proceedings of the matter were in accordance with the provisions of the lease as well as the terms and conditions of the lease. Was brought Letter; The objection that the area rented to the applicant did not fall within the National Park Area; the fact that it was twice determined that it was within the territory of the National Park Area. ? And this fact cannot be subject to the constitutional petition, the valid term for termination of the lease (15) has been approved under the Pakistan Milling Concession Rules, 1960, under which the authority to specify the lease has been granted. , As the High Court correctly found. That, under yesterday (15), the leaseholder was unconditionally granted to Pakistan Mining Concession Rules, 1960, where it was found that the area or any part thereof was not free and was leased by ignorance. Will be released and denied permission to appeal in circumstances when required when you need a advocate from Skardu lawyer