Find a Lawyer

ABID JAVED ALIAS MITHU versus THE STATE

Evidence for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) Evidence is being appreciated that the infected girl's vaginal swab was found smeared by a chemical examiner, but a brochure report sent to a serologist for semen grouping Was not prepared. In court and the Chemical Examiner's report lost its identity, two of the prosecution's witnesses were unnecessarily abandoned; an eyewitness did not claim to have seen the incident on Lady Doctor's body. No sign of violence was found. The injury to the affected woman and vaginal area, according to her, may or may not have been due to sexual abuse; the victim, who was an intelligent girl, had completely forgiven the accused, causing them to be involved. The agreement could have been due to a compromise, but the benefit of the doubt was to extend it to the accused and not to the prosecution, the accused was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances. best advocate from Eminabad lawyer