Find a Lawyer

SHEHLA RUBAB versus NIGHAT SAIFULLAH KHAN

Pakistan's Hostel Rules (1973), Arts 25 and 199 Constitutional petition Petition, A hostel resident student, a woman, leaving the hostel without the warden's permission and applying for allegations of corruption and hostel violation Applicants regarding the Principal Exit Rules and Accreditation from the Hostel were discharged from the hostel without the permission of the Hostel Warden and, thus, the rules stated in the College Principal and Hostel Committee prospectus were violated. Therefore, applicants have legal rights to consider applicants' behavior. There is a good right inside. Claim that he left the hostel cover with his male cousin whom he had married, to waive his obligation to comply with the rules and regulations of the college hostel without the permission of the hostel warden Was not enough or the principal could not leave the applicant's premises. The conduct of any ground petitioner not only violated the rules and regulations of the college, but was also against the ethics claim that no free movement of students could be imposed, as they would have been responsible for any duty. / Hold rights, the constitutional rights of the applicant were not violated as the principal of the institution. Responsible public servants were obliged to maintain discipline in their institutions under the provisions of the rules and regulations; any order issued by the principal and the hostel committee about the removal of the applicant from the hostel. This type of discount cannot be used. divorce advocates from Feroz Walla lawyer