SALMA BIBI versus MANZOOR HUSSAIN
Article 13 Constitution of Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991 (1973), Article 185 (3) Section 135 Failure to make the student publication and failure of the first person, order to ban the post before the effect of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991 The name was postponed. The appellate court's finding was affirmed by the appellate court on the ground that the victim's victimhood was not made by the plaintiff and was not made under the Student Assessment Section 13, Punjab Prevention Act 1991. Confirming the appellate court's decision and order, it was found that neither of the two former emperors entered the witness box, stating that as soon as the sale was discovered, they both announced immediately We will set up a case for possession by possession, and it is probable that none of the plaintiffs' husbands had obtained any legal result as he was not the lawyer of the former emperors at the time, the appellate court finding is correct. Certified by the High Court on a court basis. The CT and the proper assessment of the evidence were not open to any exception
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from New Saeedabad lawyer