Find a Lawyer

MARIAM versus ZUBAIDA BAI

Section 7 377 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance of Adultery (VII of 1979), Section 12 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 90, 347 and 561A of the offense under section 12 of the Penal Code During the Inquiry (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979, the Investigation Officer excluded the said offense and presented challan to the Meteor Magistrate under 5 377, concluding that the PPC magistrate had gone through the material on record. That, under Section 12 of this case, the Preliminary Crimes Act (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979 was made, on which it had no jurisdiction to prove the offense and consequently they filed Was sent to the Sessions Judge by an unusual order through a police dacoit and was not obliged to court. There was no obstacle to going through the facts of the case and deciding the case for what constituted the crime on the record and could be determined before the frame. g Whether this allegation was a trial by itself or a competent jurisdictional magistrate had rightly pointed out that, firstly, under section 12 of the Enforcement of Adultery (Enforcement) Ordinance, 1979 The crime to come. The accused had no jurisdiction to try this - the same and his order to send the file to the Sessions Judge for further proceedings was neither illegal nor illegal nor meant to misuse the process of law. And was in accordance with the provisions of section 190, CR PC. The Magistrate authorized the case under section 7347 at any stage of the proceeding, even before the decision is signed by the Sessions Court, when it is deemed to be a special hearing. law firms from Tarbela lawyer