SHAH MUHAMMAD versus WAHID BUX
Section 42 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 142 and 144 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 115 suit which is available for declaration and occupation, was admittedly owned by the plaintiff, he claimed This type of plot was purchased but could not be proved. Evidence in support of such plea Defendants did not step into the witness evidence in support of their claim, which was fatal to their defense, inability to find the facts listed on the purchase of land by the defendants through the courts. Had suffered and he could not maintain the evidence. On the record it is clearly proved that the defendants remain in the possession of the plot while on leave, with the permission and the knowledge of the plaintiff to dismiss the legal term judgment and the plaintiff's case on the one hand, And the plaintiff was assigned. The suit was ordered
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Quaidabad lawyer