Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENTOFPAKISTAN versus ZAMIRAHMED

R2 (3) [As amended SRC 861/1/78, Article 212 heard the Appeal Service Tribunal of Article 212 Government Employees under the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) of 3 July 1978, when amending R2 (3). Done. , Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973 have already come into force, expression Physically changes the expression of the Empowered Officer, but he has served in the service of the Empowered Officer Didn't even notice the change. Therefore, the new definition of Authorized Officer appearing on the face of the record clearly indicated that it was only in cases where no officer was given so much authority that such duties as were designated under the rules. May amend the provisions of R (2)) It seems to have been introduced to meet the exceptional situation where, for some reason, any person \ authority by \ authorized officer as amended Was not designated to act as, therefore, the purpose of settling matters with this R cannot be taken. The equation for the distribution of functions assigned by the rules to the \ Authorized \ and \ Authorized Officer to the functions of the \ Authorized \ and \ Authorized Officer of clearly indicates that the person to whom the \ authority is He has been designated to be higher than that person. Authorized to perform the duties of an authorized officer but no person yet designated as an authority \ authority was given the powers of any appeal over the officer, delayed by two functions. Appears to fear prejudice. Remote Service Tribunal considers amending R2 (3), Government Employees (Performance and Discipline) Rules 1973 pakistani advocates Orakzai lawyer