Find a Lawyer

NASEER AHMED versus EMPLOYEES\' OLD-AGE BENEFITS INSTITUTION

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI VI 1968), dismissing employee employed in section O15 (4) employees / Old Age Benefits Institution after inquiry. Dismissed. Under the laws of the employer, the allegations against the employee could not be proved and even the accused could be charged for misappropriation or termination of funds related to the employer's organization, negligence in the payment of his duties and ineffective treatment. Was also misused, not specifically. There was no evidence of negligence and ineligibility presented by the employer and the charge sheet was also forwarded thirty days after the alleged mismanagement, the allegation of misconduct was vague and the money was allegedly misused and Date of abuse was not mentioned in the case of the employee under the Rules (Qualification and Discipline) Rules, 1973 in priority of Government Se Ho West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968. Due to the rules of the Constitution, in the case of employees of public institutions against the rules provided for under section 15 Membership is preferred. ()) The West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968 Labor Court, in the circumstances, correctly stated that the allegations against the employee were not proved and the facts of their dismissal order and the law were not guaranteed. Is. when you need a advocate from Lawrence pur lawyer