REHMATULLAH versus SUKKUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Sections 16 and 58 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The maintenance of the Tonga Stand was justified by the Municipal Corporation challenging the removal of the Tonga Stand from a particular place in order to maintain the Constitution petition, Comparing this feature. In particular, the parking lot was taken advantage of by the municipal corporation which was rejected by section 58 of the Sindh Local Government Ordinance 1979 and all its funds and property including the Tonga stand. Were placed with the government applicant. That the municipal corporation, which was sacked, had no authority to terminate the Tinga stand without the permission of the government, according to a government-issued notification, the municipal corporation was not sacked under section 58 of the Sindh Local Government Ordinance 1979. But was dissolved in the exercise of the powers exercised by the government. Under section 16 (2) of the Sindh Local Government Ordinance, 1979, the petitioner contends that the funds and property of the municipal corporation are entrusted to the government, so the applicant was not compelled to speak the language. Fails to identify any form of removal law or may qualify the applicant. Pars Tongas, the constitutional petition challenging the removal of the Tonga stand, was not enforceable
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Abbottabad lawyer