CHIEFDIRECTOR,CENTRALDIRECTORATEOFNATIONALSAVINGS,ISLAMABAD versus RAHATALISHERWANI
R6A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 powers granted by R6A, Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973, pending such exercise of authority authority. Or was given the option to send a record of any issues resolved. No pre-requisites were provided by the competent officer in the R6A for use of such powers; Government Employees (Discipline and Discipline) Rules 1973, however, could not be arbitrarily or arbitrarily executed while present in the Rule Authority. The exercise of powers was deemed to be fair, just and in a manner that would not violate the principles of the Natural Justice Authority, as no reason was recorded because they were recorded by two competent officers. The facts did not agree with the allegations against public servants. What was not expected, in the least, was the mention of the grounds on which the authority was expected to engage in the showcase notice, on the basis of which it was inclined to adopt a contrary view so as to explain its point of view to the civil servant. Reasonable chance of justice would not justify ordering a fresh investigation, since the inquiry officer's report was started 12 years ago for good reason. An Initial Issue of Misconduct with Government Employees Again, the Authority's appeal was dismissed under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Chicha watni lawyer