Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus AHMADI BEGUM

West Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959 Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Application for removal of a co-owner allegedly a tenant who claims to be the co-owner of the property in question Restoration Linelady claims that he is in question. Was the exclusive owner of the property. The private consent of the co-owners resulted in the partition and thus the tenant had the right to bring the eviction, which was against the division of the joint lease, whenever he sold the land, he sold the whole lot. Nor did he take any part in the land. In question, and when he reclaimed the land, then the joint failed to prove ownership of the entire part of the landed land, while the alleged tenant successfully proved that he had at least some share of the land. Has become the owner. She could not maintain the eviction request against the alleged tenant who was the co-owner of the same alleged tenant and co-owner of every inch of land in question, under the definition of landlord of the West Pakistan Urban Rent Prohibition Ordinance. , And such tenant controller had no jurisdiction to order the dismissal, which was approved by the rent controller and was affirmed in the appeal, which is illegal and without jurisdiction. Was declared immigration advocates from Gadoon Amazai lawyer