Find a Lawyer

M. IFTIKHAR versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE, THE PAKISTAN TIMES, LAHORE

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22A (8) (g) and 22C Employees' Rehabilitation Employees, during the privatization of the Employer Establishment, had entered into an agreement with the Employer Establishment, along with various other employees of the Establishment, under which They were received. In exchange for the Golden Handshake offered by the Employer Establishment, a large sum of money and subsequently with the mutual consent of the employees, the other employees were terminated from the job, but no appointment letter was issued after that. There was only a written agreement. The employee between the parties, who work on a daily wage basis or against a small business, cannot be considered a permanent employee of the Establishment because the employee is not a permanent worker, because of the legal status of the National Industrial Relations Commission. Cannot claim. The alleged breach of section 15 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 may raise such a question before the Labor Court under Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, under the 1969 National Industrial Relations Commission News Service (Terms of Service) Act 1973 Had the authority to decide and hear the cases found, but through an amendment, the jurisdiction of the National Industrial Relations Commission was transferred to the tribunal petition filed by the employees against the complaint, thus Was unable to maintain the relationship under section 22A (8) (g) of the Ordinance, 1969 famous supreme court advocate from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer