ABDUL MALIK versus THE STATE
Sections 230 (b) and 2 evidence Definition of evidence The prosecution's witnesses were independent and had no reason or intention to include the accused in a false case. The evidence of the prosecution was not only permanent but also at the time of the incident. There was also the situation on record and in case of delay in filing of FIR and non-post mortem examination of the victim, details of the injuries found on the body of the accused and a juvenile given in judicial confession of the accused. The details of the wounds inflicted on the child were laid as the basis for the conclusion that the accused was ineligible for the post-mortem report. Injuries caused by non-conducting post-mortem of the body or the corpse occurred, in these circumstances, was unnecessary because the law did not require that the dead body be presented to the person killed. According to what should be done, the culprits of the accused were punished
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Sakardu lawyer