UNITED BANK LIMITED versus MUNIR AHMAD NASEER
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and 25 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section 2 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Grade II Bank Officer Bank Officer The Labor Court dismissed the Labor Appellate Tribunal from employing illicit use of the cash it received without allowing it to reimburse the benefits, allowing the High Court to uphold 50 percent of the amended Labor Court decision. The Bank's appeal dismissed by the applicant (Bank) was that the Employee Industrial Relations Ordinance, being an officer of the Bank in 1969 or West Pakistan Industrial Labor and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) As mentioned in the ordinance, "labor was not appreciated, the High Court failed to decide 1968 despite similar questions being raised in the constitutional petition itself. Such a question was referred to but not decided by other employees (Ordinance XXIII of 1969) and according to the statement in Ordinance (VII 1968), other employees were presented under the definition of \ worker the, to appeal. Permission was given to examine the depth question of the Labor Court's jurisdiction over officers. Category in which the employee was
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Guddu lawyer