Find a Lawyer

AL-RUKIYA TRADERS versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD

Sections 168 and 180 of Pakistan Customs Act 1969 (1973), Article 199 constitutional application for import of scrap iron was found to contain the goods deduction section on import license inspection and thereby seized goods seized by the customs authority. Applicants were not admitted to the notice before seizing certain parts where no showcase notice was given within two months of confiscating the goods; they were responsible for returning the party / person from whom the goods were seized. No notice of cause was given to the applicants nor the goods were returned to them, as per S, 168 (2) Customs Act 1 Was considered under 969, which was necessary because the customs authorities decided the applicant's case only to the extent that the broken and damaged auto parts are still viable authorities, not considering the fact that Broken parts of damaged vehicles may not be used in their original form, but parts of them, as such, are factored in by authorities to confirm applicants' claims, seizing goods. The order to keep was set aside, and the matter was sent to the customs authorities to decide. The scrap auto cartridge is responsible for payment of corruption from the date of disposal of the goods to the decision of the customs authorities and the date of their settlement, within the time of receipt of the expert's opinion regarding the convenience of the applicant's service. Will not Eventually, the confiscated goods become the property of the federal government responsible for paying damaging charges. immigration advocate from Fizagat lawyer