HUSSAIN BAKHSH versus MUHAMMAD ALI
The hearing of OXVIII's suit and examination of CCC's Civil Procedure Code Order XVIII, RR 5 and 8, was put aside by the recording of the evidence of the results recorded by the trial court and a recent trial on the matter. The following appeals court had sought remand for the hearing. The case was recorded by Reader of Court evidence, although it was recorded by the Reader of Court, but it was also registered in the presence of the judge, as well as counsel for the parties and the defendant / opponent's lawyer at the relevant time. Not only did I raise any objection, but without any objection to the trial court whose evidence was available to the reader, according to R8 of CPC XVIII of the CPC, its certificate was also given, = O XVIII Provisions of RR 5 and 8 were sufficiently valid to the CPC, no unlawful interference by the trial court was committed and in these circumstances , Approved the decree may not be revoked nor may get the police on the matter.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Minchanabad lawyer
