Find a Lawyer

LIAQAT ALI versus THE STATE

Section 302 was two versions of the case definition of evidence. One version was given by the prosecution, while in its FIR prosecution, the accused simply forwarded the second version, depending on the suspect allegedly dating two to two years before the incident. Was on extra-judicial confession and even in situations where both were suspicious. In nature, the suspect's version was supported by the ocular version, and the police made the accused without investigating the version given by the accused after shaking hands with the accused principal lawmaker for a fair decision in the two-version case. The two versions had to be placed somewhere. Then, in the light of the evidence brought on record, the court had to see which version was closer to the facts and the truth, with the condition that the responsibility for the evidence always remained in the prosecution and any defect in the defense The accused cannot be prosecuted for this. If the prosecution fails to deliver the accused's guilt, then there is no clear reliance on the prosecution's version of the tune's reliance on the alleged extra-judicial confession and circumstantial evidence because a closer examination of the prosecution's evidence led to this version. Was exposed because the wrong version given by the prosecution is contrary to the record, the accused was convicted as a result of abortion of justice, the accused was acquitted, best law firms from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer