Find a Lawyer

SAFIA AZIZ versus DIL ARA MALIK

Article 212 (3) The appeal of the sanitary against the sanitary list was dismissed by the service tribunal Supreme Court, under which the government employee was sent to the service tribunal to determine the international seniority seniority list. This was then issued by the department's respondents and a modification request was filed for its completion. The pending appeals service tribunal has allowed the amendment of the appeal memorandum. The applicant claimed that the defendant should have been represented in the department and then had to file fresh appeal for fresh reasons. Because of this, it was implemented, therefore, the amendment request was misconstrued, before the final list of seniority confirmed that civil servants had been in conflict for many years and In keeping with the Supreme Court's preliminary injunction, the service was included in the international seniority list. Tribunal decision to allow pending appeal modification To determine InterC's claim in final jurisdictional list, service tribunal's decision to allow pending appeal modification was unimaginable The petition did not include any substantive question about the law of public importance as contemplated under Article 212. The leave to appeal the constitution was denied in the circumstances top advocates from Chicha watni lawyer