Find a Lawyer

SHAHID IQBAL versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD

Arts (87 ()) and Q 185 Q Legislative Martyrdom (10 of 1984 1984), Article 2,, Illumination (e) Civil Procedure Code (v. 19088), A. XXXX, RR 1 and 2 Interim Relief, Option Approval of the jurisdiction, the Permanent Employee Board of Revenue was forwarded to the Senate Secretariat on deputation as the Joint Secretary federal government had placed such employee's services at the disposal of its parent department. As the Central Board of Revenue High Court had initially granted interim relief to the employees, the order was later vacated. Employee Being a Public Employee, Dispute: The legal documents on record happily with their terms and conditions of service indicate that the Central Board of Revenue (Parent Department of Employees) has the status of a permanent employee of the Senate Secretariat. There is no objection to the employee being recruited from and the Central Board of Revenue sent such request without any objection to the relevant authority, ie the Establishment Division. The Senate Secretariat had the consent of the relevant authorities in the Grade 20 as Joint Secretary. It was believed to have been performed regularly. The Central Board of Revenue had not directly objected to the Senate Secretariat and had taken action to remove employees. The power of the Income Tax Group officers will be reflected by the fact that the employees were absorbed by the consent of the competent authority in the Senate Secretariat, Senate employees acknowledged the provisions of Article 87 (3) of the Government employees. Do not fall into the category. The appeal for the constitutional application was changed to a leave appeal and its cause tax advocates from Baroute lawyer