Find a Lawyer

PERVAIZ ANJUM GHAURI versus ABDUL RAHIM

Section 34 (2) and 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), Article 185 (3) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991, dismissal of a hearing on a petition seeking disclosure in relation to the effective effect of the provision of section 34 (2). ? Section 34 (2) of the Pre-Emission Act, 1991, the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991, shall apply to those cases in which the decisions and orders were passed before 31 198 1986, filed in 1987, section 34 (2). 2) The provisions of this Act will not be applicable to the plaintiff, therefore, it was required to meet the needs of the students under Section 13, Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991, which the plaintiff stated in his case Did not say that the e-mail was made in the presence of two truths. Neither the witnesses nor the defendant stated that they had made the plea agreement after the fact of the sale was made known, and then, within two weeks from the date of knowledge, a written notice certified by the two true witnesses. By sending, provoking the students, registering Corps v Ends, while affirming their right to pre-arrest, the High Court had dealt extensively with the plaintiffs about the convictions already raised and good and It was rejected for good reason. famous high court advocate from Wah Cantt lawyer