ALI MURAD versus THE STATE
Pakistan Panel Code Section 497 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/307/34 Bail, Prior to the trial court's grant granted to the accused on the third and fourth power, 5 497 (1), CR PC bail But withdrew his order knowing that both amendments were excluded by ordinance and the accused was remanded in custody if the accused was released on bail on 24 199 1993. So, he was far more entitled than BT, to some extent, released in 1894, when both Proviso (third and fourth to section 497 (1), CCP) withdrew their field with full force in July 1994. I again The court's failure to ensure the presence of the detained accused, and to revoke the defendant's plans to remain absent, damages his credibility, therefore, his Can't be blamed for such delays - The charges were admitted on bail under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Daud Khel lawyer