Find a Lawyer

NAGINA COTTON INDUSTRIES versus COTTON EXPORT CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (N.) LTD.

The delay in filing an appeal for verification of the delay of section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908, meant that instead of passing the order on 3 199 1993, as soon as it was declared, the delay was decided for the period between 3 1993. What was And 18 2 1993 was tried, even if the appellant's claim was true and if any question was still there, it was not available on 3 2 1993, or in later dates, it is a fact. That the appellant knew that such an order had been made compulsory. Regardless of the order's availability to obtain a certified copy of it on 3 1993, it was the responsibility of the appellant to apply for a certified copy of an order containing certified copies of which There are copies, there is no delay. Rules that follow a decision according to a set time, and which usually decide to be on the same date as the decision was announced at the time of the decision, regardless of whether or not. E was prepared as was also available to the appellant, his failure to apply for it on the due date ie 3 2 1993 will go away for the delayed condolences. top advocate from Shemier lawyer