EDDO versus FIDA HUSSAIN TAPAL
Sindh Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 15 (2) (ii) was charged with default in payment of rent for eight months the tenant claimed that his nephew had paid the landlord's son rent for six months. , But did not provide a receipt for this tenant. It has also been claimed that a two-month rent was sent to the landlord through a money order, but was denied by the tenant's landlord's nephew, who allegedly gave the landlord's son six months' rent. They were not examined to prove the payment, while the landlord's son appeared and the tenant refusing such payment also tendered the rent to the landlord for two months through a money order. Failure to do so, under the circumstances, the rent controller has rightly been able to prove that the tenant has paid the rent for a controversial period of eight months. Has failed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Jhudo lawyer