Find a Lawyer

SAEEDA BEGUM versus MUKHTAR AHMAD BUTT

Mortgages of property without provisions 58 and 54 of the Property Act, 1882, during the course of his life by registered deed mortgagor, the mortgagee was nominated by the mortgagee as a member of the cooperative society under question; Mortgages claiming property ownership under the designation by the mortgagee as a member of the Society indicate that the title claimed by the claimant was not so oral as the mortgagee did. The fact of community nomination is that nomination of a mortgage as a member of the society must be either a property transfer or nomination. Self-denial of cancellation designation did not mean, therefore, that there was no indication of transfer or sale of property in favor of the mortgage, the fact that the mortgage was entered into between the parties in 1934, through the registered process. Was. Point out that if there was a sale, it would be registered as well; the parties are accustomed to doing such matters. The absence of registration of the sale with the property itself will indicate that there was no sale of the property. The mortgage case itself suggested that no such sale was made, as the mortgagee claimed to have the basis of the title in the property, so that the nominee could not claim any portion. Property mortgages Although they have been nominated as members of the cooperative society by mortgages, they cannot claim title to such a designation in the absence of a valid sale. lawer from fb area from Shogram lawyer