Find a Lawyer

WASEY ZAFAR versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Arts 184 (3), 18 and 23 Goods Act (III of 1930), section 23 Customs Act (IV of 1969), section 19 section RO number 1046 (1) / 91 dated 14 10 1991 section R number 251 (I) / 93 Dated 3 4 1993 Section R No. 493 (I) / 93 Dated 14 6 1993 Section RA No. 815 (1) / 93 Dated 169 1993 Section R No. 825 (I) / 93 Dated 209 1993 Customs General Order No. 13 1993 The sale and customization of non-government goods under a government scheme by the applicants to the Constitutional Appeal to the Supreme Court, the applicants and the seller in respect of these rights had the sole right to balance the cost of the goods with the applicants. The extent to which the applicant's claim According to the working scheme, the imported goods had the right to be disposed of, due to obstruction or refusal by the government, it was a violation of their liberty and the acquisition, possession and possession of property in accordance with legal trade and business and their rights. To pursue the right of dispossession which was given under Articles 18 and 23 in accordance with the law, which is a question of public interest, in relation to claimant relief in judicial petition pursuant to Article 184 (3) of the Constitution. The requirement was satisfied and to this extent the applications were feasible power of attorney advocate Kharan lawyer