FAZAL ELLAHI SIDDIQUI versus PAKISTAN
A. XXVI, R 1 The basis of the Supreme Court's review of the judgment, that the Supreme Court failed to hold fast documents, the Supreme Court felt no need to examine the specific documents for the Service Tribunal. Due to the dismissal of the petitioner's appeal, which was upheld by the Supreme Court decision which is seeking review, so that the stage for scrutiny of such application arises (keeping in view the specific documents). If the service tribunal delayed filing a service appeal, no review was made for the reason. Of the decision
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer
