Find a Lawyer

JEHANA versus TAJA

Limitation Act 1908 Sections 4 and 5 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), delaying the filing of an appeal with section 115 appeal, was rejected by the court with the delay in filing the appeal because from time to time Was banned for blasphemy. The parties were denied any opportunity or opportunity to establish the right. Copies of the judgment appealed against the court were referred to in relation to the period, even after the fact that the court was closed for summer vacations in the month of August. The month of August was used solely as the basis for dismissal of the appeal which was in breach of the provisions of section 4, the Limitation Act, 1908, under which such period was bound to be excluded from the premises. After such deliberations, who had made such illicit deliberations, the court clearly did not know and no inquiry had been made regarding the former before submitting the application for copies of the decision. Was tendered, the anonymous order passed in the appeal constituted an act of corrupt exercise of jurisdiction under section 115 of the CPC. online advocate from Lakimarwat lawyer