Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH versus MANZOOR ELAHI

Part 4 of the Partition Act 1893, the suit for the division of the real estate filed by either of the two brothers, the defendant's brother objected that it had been alleged that the private partisanship between the parties was already between the tribes. The tribesmen came to the property, a house and a plot acquired by the two brothers with joint funds. In connection with the joint venture, Plaintiff's brother Ounce was involved with the defendant to prove that the property in the dispute was privately distributed among the parties, who alleged that such division was the plaintiff's There was no reliable oral or documentary evidence to prove the point. The property was replaced. The plaintiff also failed to prove that the house and plot allegedly falling on the part of the alleged brother as a result of a private division were purchased from the joint venture and the defendant's son's funds, which were adopted by the plaintiff's brother Nobody had His own and the plaintiff's wife's case were the founders of the house and plot, respectively. The appellate court's finding, under the fact of private division of the real estate, was not established on the basis of evidence on record, it did not differ. Go. pakistani advocates Pannu aqil lawyer