Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus SABAN

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), section 53 suit for the declaration that the claimant was the owner of the land owned and vice versa, because the record in the rights record was ineffective because his property was in question. The ground was, the defendant's father's acceptance of the claim that he was the buyer of the price could not be established because of the lack of evidence because the entry of the plaintiff's entry showed the plaintiff's father showing a non-reasonable Kaz. The premise was based on a misconception. Such an entry cannot affect the status of the plaintiff's father. Under the question, being part of the commonwealth's father, he could either be separated from the land or deprived of the defendant's negative possession of the property, which he did not request, So they are not alienated and in negative possession. The defendants, the plaintiff was the owner of the commonwealth, owned it and, after his death, his daughter (the plaintiff) owned the land. famous supreme court advocate from Malakand lawyer