Find a Lawyer

QURBAN ALI versus MEMBER (REVENUE), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

R 19 (2) Appointment of lumberman at the place of the applicant as the son of the deceased lumber holder, his successor has been appointed to the Board of Revenue on account of the applicant's alleged non-residence, he has been disqualified and the defendant is lumber holder. Both the Weldati Collector and the Commissioner were appointed. It was found that the applicant did not face non-resident disqualification at his appointment to the Board of Revenue, without changing the contents of the record which supported the applicant's residence at his place of appointment. Recorded his opinion in a slip manner and assumed that the applicant should be non-resident and he is considered ineligible for the appointment of a lumber holder on this score Applicants' case was not a matter of first appointment, but of the appointment of a successor. And it entered R 19 (2), west. Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968 Inheritance was an important factor in the appointment of the successor to the office of the limber but no other defect was found with the applicant to remain in the post of alleged non-resident, limber holder. Was denied and presented evidence in support of his claim that the Board of Revenue did not appear on the evidence presented by the applicant. The applicant was entitled to consider the material he had to record his preferred eligibility for appointment to the Board of Revenue, therefore, there was a clear case of mistreatment of the facts as a whole at that point. ? The result of the problem reached by the Board of Revenue was not only flawed but unsatisfactory, it was also sustainable. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Rahimyar Khan lawyer