Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAR versus THE STATE

Explosive Substance Act 1908 Section 5 Testimony of Evidence The investigating officer explained that several persons had gathered on the occasion of the recovery, none of them willing to be witnesses The statements of the restoration witnesses showed recovery in this case. Was Genuine and recovered articles could not be charged to the accused; any political enmity or enmity with the police, as the accused has stated, cannot be inferred to show his false interference in the evidence that under these circumstances. The defendant's sentence was upheld. RI was awarded for 14 years for being too harsh, however, it was reduced to seven years for RI 5 5 382 B exploited, even in cases involving CRP order convict and immovable property. Kept separate lawer from fb area from Lawrence pur lawyer