Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALI versus THE STATE

The testimony of the witness of the recovery of the testimony of the Section 13 Explosives Act (XI of 1908), S4 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), section 103 evidence did not inspire confidence as it recovered the hand grenade on the occasion of the accused. Was not observed. Although the recovery site was located in a populated area, none of the area residents was involved in the recovery process which is a violation of section 103, because the CCPC Investigation Officer was the complainant in this case. Was interested in convicting the accused and his statement was not corroborated by any independent evidence, the accused was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances. immigration advocate from Fateh Jang lawyer