Find a Lawyer

SAEED AHMAD SHAH versus THE STATE

Article 2 Q2 Law In this testimony (Article 10 of 1984 10), Article evidence evidence Appreciate the evidence The defendant's confession is true and cannot be voluntarily used against him or allegedly against him. Both places of the accused were identified as having no cause for recovery of any material found in the FIR, but there was no connection to the crime of identifying the accused, which was a practice of wasteful expenditure. And the evidence was neither credible nor superstitious. best advocate from Matiari lawyer