Find a Lawyer

WAJID UMAR ALIAS GOGI versus THE STATE

Section 17 (4) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/34, 324/34 and 336/34 [Repealed by the Criminal Law (Fourth Amendment) Ordinance (XXX of 1991)] by the trial court The prosecution's witnesses were not examined. Testimony began to meet the requirements of Al-Shudh, but at the end of his related cross-examination he asked him some questions to fulfill the required requirements in this regard, but he failed to provide the opportunity, the accused. In order to investigate, the witnesses said that the trial court's failure to allow the accused to do so was a violation of whatever was in the record to support the charge against him. He has been brought in to give him an opportunity to challenge and thus fight against it. Established the principles of criminal justice management and dealt with it with great prejudice, resulting in the conviction and sentencing of the accused and was remanded to the trial court for the latest hearing. Accused by law: solicitors from Khair Pur Mir lawyer