Find a Lawyer

KHUDA BAKHSH BALUCH versus METROPOLITAN STEEL CORPORATION LTD., KARACHI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section O 15 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 5 and 14 unfair labor practice Appellant Worker He was dismissed for certain acts of corruption and found guilty of domestic inquiries. After the respondents' notice was served, the appellant's worker filed an application with the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC) under sections 22A (8) and 53, 15. Read with section 25A, the Industrial Relations Ordinance National Industrial Relations Commission found the defendant corporation guilty of unfair labor practice and on appeal of the appellant's reinstatement, the entire NIRC bench sentenced the defendant. Separated, but the National Industrial Relations Commission's decision to reinstate the appellant was challenged by the two sides before the High Court, which set aside the restraining order. Ali's sentence was set aside, the National Industrial Relations Commission does not grant relief under Section 25A , The Industrial Relations Ordinance Appellant then filed a complaint with the Labor Court with the request, until the ordinance came under the delay of the Labor Court under section B 65B until it was delayed which is not sufficiently explained. Was done Complaint request dismissed. The appellant claimed that the delay occurred during proceedings before the National Industrial Relations Commission and the High Court. Article 14 of the Prohibited Limitations Act was relaxed by the Labor Court; online advocate from Chitral lawyer