KHUDA-E-DAD versus BIBI NAZIRAN
In the Code of Civil Code 1908 S_96 the transfer of property, in favor of the defendants being valid, their claim was against the appellant who was included in such property by the defendants - only as a license, at trial The trial court correctly ruled. However, the decision to grant accounts against the appellant was unwarranted and was rejected for lack of evidence, so the trial court's order in this case was amended, while the property owned The order for possession was retained, while the prescription portion was placed on the side of the accounts
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Chohar Jamali lawyer
