GOLDEN INDUSTRIES EMPLOYEES UNION versus GOLDEN INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD.
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 33 (3A) West, Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section 11A Reviewing Respondent Industries applied for permission to close the establishment on the basis that The living union claimed. The respondents applied for closure of their factory when there was a strike and there was no strike and the work in the factory was going on with full force and in fact the defendant had engaged more workers that the petitioner. The union wanted to show proof of this effect was not harmed and the request to summon witnesses and the petitioner's labor court's request to record certain records was denied. Respondent's lawyer defended the Labor Court's ruling that the action was postponed for the purpose of delay, but acknowledged that there was no restriction, or that the parties in connection with seeking witnesses and requesting documents. The extent of when witnesses were to appear or when documents were to be submitted, they are advised not to delay the date when the Labor Appellate Tribunal is directed to summon witnesses and to furnish certain records / documents and accordingly The Labor Court order was amended.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Zhob lawyer