NUR JEHAN BEGUM versus MUJTABA ALI NAQVI
The Conan e Testimony Order 1984 Arts 2 (1) (c) and 132 (2) does not examine the witness on the material part of his evidence The implication would be that his fact was accepted on the other hand, which was the witness who was the material In the context of the controversy of this case, especially when describing your case when not challenged in cross-examination, then such an unorganized statement should be given full credibility and generally acknowledged as true. Should not be displaced by reliable, integrated and clear evidence
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Sudhnoti lawyer
