Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus THE STATE

No general account of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34, 201/34 and 404/34 cases was available and the prosecutor delayed the evidence of additional judicial confession made by the accused before the prosecution witnesses, the victim Evidence of the jeep being found in the possession of the suspect, evidence of the confiscation of weapons and other items found near the site from which the deceased's body was recovered, and such information was received from the Office of the Forensic Science Laboratory, Chemical Examiner and Serologist Manner. In which allegedly confessional statements were made. The accusation of the prosecution's testimony was absolutely unbelievable and not in line with the behavior of an ordinary careful person. Such statements of the prosecution's witnesses, which were not credible, cannot be relied upon as evidence of the jeep's recovery from the suspect's occupation. Evidence of the seizure of weapons and other items suspended on the spot was allegedly impacted by the deceased's real brother on various dates and witnesses who showed interest were not related to the place where they were recovered. Impact that the testimony of the recovery witness, which did not affect the trust, could not be relied upon for identification. The report about the vacancy from the forensic science laboratory office was disclosed, according to the police constable. The parcel delivered to him from the police station was delivered a day later . Before the pistol was recovered, the empty parts were not handed over, nor were they deposited in the office of the forensic science laboratory and the background of such prosecution witnesses ask a advocate free from Haripur lawyer