WAPDA versus MUHAMMAD KHALID
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) Service Tribunal Applicant ordering removal of a civil servant and lower sentence, it was held that the service tribunal erred in delaying the filing of the appeal legally, even though the government employee made a request. Was not given For the late condolence petitioner further claimed that the service tribunal's finding on the facts aspect was based on misrepresentation of evidence. Accepting this version of a public servant that he was ordered to be dismissed on a due date, and thus prioritizing his appeal within a thirty-day legal period. Regarding the question that no delay was filed by the public servant as was the case at the discretion, the search for Service Tribune 2 could not be left alone due to isolation No NGO's for the grant. After the leave was terminated, the appeal was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Lalshanra lawyer