HAJI ABDUL AZIZ versus MUHAMMAD YUNUS
Pakistan Penal Code Section 307/365/326/109 & 148/149 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), 5 439 In the review against evil eye witnesses, the person who was in Saudi Arabia at the time of the incident was not named. Those found innocent by the police were exaggerated by the complainant and other eyewitnesses who did not show contempt for the oath taken by them; no judicial conviction was left, including an innocent person. The prosecution's witnesses could not name the other accused in the trial court. Used his conscientious mind on relevant facts and evidence, and offered valid and authoritative reasons for dismissing the prosecution's case, and the decision to dismiss the ocular evidence was neither misleading nor illegal. Eyewitnesses were also responsible for the pernicious accusation of eyewitnesses. If the innocent person was not falsely implicated, the real culprit could not escape the punishment so the cases of bad acquittal were not interfered with.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Tall lawyer
