Find a Lawyer

AHMAD ALIAS AHMUN versus THE STATE

Testimonies of Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34, 449/34 and 324/34 evidence, names of witnesses were immediately mentioned in the FIR: FIRs were in fact suspected of being lost. The presence of eyewitnesses on the spot was enough, with the fact that the witness was naturally injured, leaving nine lives and two wounded in Irish, while only four were named as accused. Was nominated on In this case, the accused's family did not include other family members or their other enemies. The evidence was straightforward. The accused were formerly known as eyewitnesses, as they were in a position to identify nine victims and two prosecution witnesses. The background of the incident was much lower than the number of designated offenders, indicating that the suspects were the individuals who were expected to be involved in the crime. Did not suffer major discrepancies or dishonest improvements. The statements of truth witnesses proved the recovery of the revelations. The investigation was linked to the serologist and the criminal science laboratory accused, there was no weakness in the prosecution version of the incident. The defendant, who received statements from the prosecution's witnesses, neither testified nor testified on the oath in support of the allegations leveled against him. immigration advocates from Kandhkot lawyer