Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMIN versus MUHAMMAD YASIN

Civil Code 1908 Claimant / Defendant of suit suit for administration of property left by the deceased father of the 10 parties, had earlier filed a case for recovery of possession, damages and masonry profits, the defendant / The trial court had already dismissed the property management's case involving the property in the earlier case filed by the plaintiff in the dispute, but the appeal against the decision and the decree were admissible. Pending, the case filed by the defendant was property in dispute, in which it was the same The case was the subject of the first among Accain. The decision had to be made whether the property was inherited by the parties and it was the property of their late father or it was exclusively the property of the respondent as the defendant's claim in his subsequent claim was his alleged right Was not able to claim ownership of the property in dispute with Claimant Relief through its proprietary claim independent of CCS, Mason's profits and damages, which was sought by the defendant in a later case. , Depending on the determination of the title question as in the first case the applicant claimed that in the circumstances the respondent was then Some relief could not be found. The question regarding the title in relation to the property was decided, in which circumstances the entire provisions of the CPC apply and the trial court erred in refusing to stop the proceedings in the case filed by the respondent High Court under which the case. A hearing was ordered. Appeal to the already established administration suit on appeal tax advocates from Hattian lawyer