Find a Lawyer

ZIA AHMAD MAKHDOOM versus PAK SUZUKI MOTOR COMPANY LTD

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Memorandum abolishing Section Oz 12 and 15 Service, operated under Appellant, Motor Company, sent to Japan for training. Where he allegedly picked her up without any payment department store and left-wing articles, but was arrested by the ground women on the ground floor, who later handed her over to the police appellant and eventually returned to Pakistan. And his services were terminated as a result of a domestic investigation. Appellant picked up some articles on each floor of the departmental store mentioned above and did not know that payment would be made. The appellant was under the impression that he should be paid on the first floor when he was detained by a guard, he inquired whether he had bought these articles, the worker stated that he wanted to buy two articles. There were witnesses to the incident that attracted Japan and it was said that when the appellant was detained on the lower floor he was looking for a counter to pay, it is likely that some of the language problems Misunderstanding may arise when the appellant was prosecuted for dismissal. A letter from the general manager of a motor company related to Japan but the author of the letter / telecom was not an eyewitness to the incident, nor was the appellant given the opportunity to investigate it, only from Japan. The letter or the telephone tax was not enough to convict the applicant. Even the record of the offense of mismanagement does not prove to be an allegation of corruption against the appellant best law firm from Poonch lawyer